top of page
Search

What Are ISO, JIS, DIN, and ASME?

  • Writer: 翰君 陳
    翰君 陳
  • 4 days ago
  • 5 min read

The Essential Beginner’s Guide to Global Fastener Standards

The reason hardware parts can be used, replaced, and serviced across machines worldwide comes down to one thing: standards.

There are many standards in the world, but in fasteners and mechanical parts, you’ll most often run into these four: ISO, JIS, DIN, and ASME.


This article will walk you through the origin, differences, and use cases of these four major standards in a clear and practical way, so that choosing, purchasing, or maintaining parts becomes much less confusing.

---

1. Why Do Hardware Components Need Standards?


Screws, nuts, washers, retaining rings, dowel pins… all of these are mating parts.Without common standards:

  • Parts may not fit together at all

  • Components from different brands can’t be interchanged

  • Imported equipment becomes impossible to service

  • Factories can’t collaborate or share parts

In the early days of industrialization, each country defined its own system based on domestic needs, which led to a jungle of standards.


Today, however, the global market is essentially dominated by four major systems:

ISO, DIN, JIS, and ASME.

---

2. Why These Four: ISO, JIS, DIN, and ASME?


There are many standards in the world, but these four became global mainstream for three main reasons.


(1) They cover the world’s major industrial ecosystems

  • ISO → International equipment, cross-border manufacturing, European factories

  • DIN → German and European machine tool systems

  • JIS → Japanese and Asian precision equipment (3C, semiconductor, automation)

  • ASME → U.S. mechanical engineering, construction, piping and pressure systems

In practice, over 90% of factories and machines fall under one of these four standards.


(2) Complete, well-documented, and widely supported by the supply chain

All four standard systems offer:

  • Full specifications for screws, nuts, washers, retaining rings, etc.

  • Open and well-documented standards that are easy to look up

  • Strong support from global suppliers like MISUMI, McMaster-Carr, Bossard

  • A mature supply chain where compatible parts are easy to source worldwide

In other words, these four systems have become a kind of “common language” of global manufacturing.


(3) Easier to cross-reference, convert, and verify

  • ISO, DIN, and JIS share many cross-reference equivalents (e.g. DIN 912 ≈ ISO 4762)

  • ASME works alongside ANSI and IFI with clear division of responsibilities

Compared to more regional standards (UNI, NF, KS, GB, etc.):

These four offer the best documentation, easiest cross-country comparison, and lowest risk of error in maintenance and replacement.



---

3. Positioning and Background of the Four Major Standards



1. ISO (International) – The Most Widely Used Global Standard

The mission of ISO is simple:

Let the world manufacture and communicate using a unified set of standards.

Key characteristics:

  • Jointly developed by multiple countries

  • Emphasizes consistency, safety, and interoperability

  • Commonly seen in European equipment, automated production lines, and global systems

  • Many countries are progressively aligning their local standards to ISO


2. DIN (Germany) – A Symbol of Precision and Consistency

DIN has long earned the trust of Taiwanese factories and exporters, because:

  • Germany is a global leader in machine tools and precision manufacturing

  • DIN specifications are clear, highly precise, and inspection-oriented

  • Taiwan imported large volumes of German equipment in the past, so DIN became the de facto standard

In many factories, when people say “standard parts”, they often implicitly mean DIN parts.


3. JIS (Japan) – The Main Language of Precision Industries in Asia

JIS became widespread in Asia because:

  • Japan has a strong base in electronics, optics, 3C, and semiconductor industries

  • Taiwan and Korea have long relied on Japanese equipment

  • Taiwanese CNS and Korean KS are largely aligned with JIS/ISO

Characteristics:

  • Very strict dimensional and tolerance requirements

  • Well-suited for precision machining

  • Commonly found in automation modules, jigs, fixtures, and electronic equipment

If your equipment is from a Japanese brand, chances are JIS is the default standard.


4. ASME (United States) – The Backbone of Engineering and Pressure Systems

ASME’s role is broader than just screw specifications. It also governs:

Mechanical design, piping, boilers, and pressure vessels with a strong focus on safety.


Key points:

  • Uses both inch (imperial) and metric systems

  • Focuses on engineering analysis and safety factors

  • Widely applied in American machinery, construction, HVAC, piping, and hydraulic systems

In short:

Whenever you’re dealing with high-risk or engineering-grade systems, you’re very likely in ASME territory.

---

4. The Relationship Between ASME and ANSI – A Common Source of Confusion


Many engineers mix up ASME and ANSI, so let’s clarify:
  • ANSI – Approves and oversees standards (“the ministry of education”)

  • ASME – Drafts and maintains technical engineering standards (“the textbook author”)

In practice:

  • Thread series (UNC, UNF) → Usually defined under ANSI / IFI

  • Equipment geometry, piping, pressure vessels → Governed by ASME

They are not in conflict; they work together with different roles.


---

5. Comparison of the Four Major Standards


Standard

Measurement System

Core Characteristics

Typical Applications

ISO

Metric

International, widely adopted

Automation, cross-border equipment

DIN

Metric

High precision, strong German legacy

Machine tools, automation modules

JIS

Metric

High precision, Asian mainstream

3C, semiconductors, Japanese-brand equipment

ASME

Imperial + Metric

Engineering / pressure systems focus

U.S. machinery, construction, piping systems


---

6. Which Standards Are Used on Which Equipment?


Each country developed its own industrial ecosystem, so the equipment coming from that country will naturally follow its local standards.

Once you know where the machine comes from, you can quickly guess whether it uses ISO, DIN, JIS, or ASME.

Equipment vs. Standards – Quick Reference


Equipment / Industry Type

Common Standards

Explanation

European equipment, automated production lines

ISO, DIN

European industry is built around ISO/DIN

German machine tools, automation modules

DIN

Taiwan historically imported many German systems

Japanese equipment, 3C, electronics, semiconductor lines

JIS

Japanese brands dominate; high precision requirements

U.S. machinery, construction, pressure vessels / piping

ASME

Strong emphasis on safety factors and structural integrity

Taiwanese local machinery and custom equipment

Mix of DIN, JIS, and ISO

Equipment sources are diverse

Imported American factories / OEM systems

ANSI, ASME

Mostly inch-based threads and U.S.-spec components



---

7. Tips to Avoid Mixing Standards


  • Always confirm the origin of the equipment

  • Distinguish metric vs. imperial from the start

  • Do not substitute one standard’s screws with another

  • Mixing standards can cause stripped threads, galling, or even fractures

  • If you’re not sure:→ Take clear photos, measure the key dimensions, and ask your supplier to verify


---

8. Why Work with Sheng Fong Precision?


Sheng Fong Precision specializes in a mixed metric/imperial supply chain, helping you quickly:

  • Identify which standard your equipment uses

  • Cross-reference dimensions, head styles, thread pitches, and tolerances

  • Find compatible equivalents across ISO / JIS / DIN / ASME

  • Source alternatives for MISUMI, McMaster-Carr, and other global brands

  • Reduce downtime and prevent damage caused by using the wrong standard



📩 LINE: @s9000If you’re unsure which standard or replacement spec you should use, send us your requirements – we’ll help you find the correct standard and a reliable alternative.


 
 
 

Recent Posts

See All

Comments


bottom of page